When streaming platforms first entered the content arms race, they did so with deep pockets and an aggressive acquisition strategy that sent production budgets skyrocketing. Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV+, Disney+, and HBO Max all began bidding wars for top-tier talent, exclusive IP rights, and high-budget series. The result? An unsustainable inflation in costs across the board. According to reports from The Wall Street Journal and Fortune, certain episodes of shows like *Stranger Things* and *The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power* have exceeded $30 million per episode—figures typically reserved for blockbuster films, not weekly episodic content.
This spending frenzy was initially justified as a growth strategy, aimed at attracting subscribers and securing market dominance. Jennifer Turner, former executive vice president of TriStar Television, explains that during this period, “the cost of acquiring [intellectual property], attaching talent, and the scope and scale of productions increased dramatically.” However, now that the subscriber base has largely plateaued, the focus has shifted from expansion to profitability—and the financial burden of past excesses is still being felt today. Even tech giant Apple reportedly lost over $1 billion annually by investing more than $5 billion into Apple TV since its 2019 launch, illustrating just how precarious the streaming economy has become.
Amid these economic pressures, AI has emerged as a potential savior—or at least a promising assistant. Tools like Google’s Veo and other generative models offer filmmakers and producers the ability to streamline workflows, automate repetitive tasks, and reduce labor-intensive processes. In post-production alone, artificial intelligence has been used to enhance visual effects, clean up dialogue, and even alter actors’ voices. For instance, AI played a key role in *Emilia Pérez*, where it was used to modify vocal performances, and in *The Brutalist*, where synthetic textures were integrated into architectural visuals. These applications show that AI is no longer just a theoretical concept—it’s actively shaping the final product.
Still, despite these advancements, many industry veterans remain skeptical about AI’s ability to fully replace human creativity. Rob Rosenberg, former executive vice president and general counsel of Showtime Networks, argues that while AI can act as a useful tool akin to CGI or digital compositing, the technology hasn't yet proven itself as a transformative force capable of overhauling the entire filmmaking pipeline. “The industry is counting on the promise of efficiencies from AI streamlining workflows and automating labor-intensive tasks, but they haven’t yet generated proofs of concept that would cause everyone to dive in,” he noted. This cautious optimism underscores a broader sentiment: AI may be here to stay, but its full potential remains unrealized.
Even as AI begins to infiltrate scriptwriting, editing, and character design, the issue of creative ownership and job displacement looms large. The Writers Guild of America strike in 2023 highlighted widespread concerns among screenwriters about the use of AI in crafting scripts and generating narrative content. Over 11,000 writers walked off the job, demanding protections against AI encroachment into their craft. Their fears weren’t unfounded—early experiments in AI-generated scripts showed enough promise to make studios consider alternatives to traditional writing teams, especially for lower-tier content or background dialogue generation.
Beyond labor disputes, there are deeper philosophical questions about what constitutes authentic storytelling. Kevin Mayer, former Disney executive, pointed out that “content’s squeezed right now, and it takes a lot of money to create great content.” He emphasized that while AI might assist in some areas, the emotional depth, cultural resonance, and nuanced character development that define successful films and shows still require human input. AI-generated narratives often lack the unpredictability and raw emotion that come from lived experience and collaborative artistry. Until machines can replicate that complexity, the core of Hollywood’s creative process will remain firmly in human hands.
Despite skepticism, AI has already delivered tangible results in several high-profile projects. One of the most notable examples is *The Brutalist*, which utilized machine learning to refine architectural renderings and integrate historical textures seamlessly into its visuals. Similarly, *Emilia Pérez* leveraged AI to modify vocal performances, allowing actors to portray characters outside their natural vocal range without compromising authenticity. These innovations demonstrate that AI can serve as a powerful augmentation tool rather than a replacement.
Another example comes from voice modulation, where AI has been employed to adjust accents and even resurrect deceased actors’ voices for archival footage. Adrian Brody’s Oscar-winning performance in *The Brutalist* reportedly benefited from AI-enhanced language coaching, helping him perfect a Hungarian accent that sounded native. Likewise, Tom Hanks and Harrison Ford have both appeared in roles where AI de-aged them, preserving their iconic presence without relying solely on makeup or prosthetics. These applications illustrate how AI can extend an actor’s career and bring new dimensions to storytelling, though they also raise ethical questions about consent, legacy, and the blurred line between reality and simulation.
Looking ahead, the integration of AI into film and television production is likely to accelerate—but not without resistance. Studios will continue experimenting with AI-driven tools to cut costs and speed up production cycles, particularly for background work, visual effects, and data-driven decision-making in casting and marketing. However, the human element will remain indispensable for high-stakes, emotionally resonant storytelling. The challenge moving forward will be striking a balance between automation and artistry—one that respects creative labor while embracing technological evolution.
Moreover, regulatory frameworks and union agreements will play a crucial role in determining how AI is deployed across the industry. As seen with the WGA strike, workers are keenly aware of the risks posed by unchecked AI adoption. Future negotiations may include clauses that limit AI’s use in creative writing, ensure fair compensation for AI-assisted work, or establish transparency around AI-generated content. These developments will shape not only the future of Hollywood but also the global entertainment landscape, influencing how stories are told, who gets to tell them, and how audiences engage with them in an increasingly algorithmic world.