In a significant development within the boxing world, Dmitry Bivol has relinquished his WBC light heavyweight championship title. This decision, communicated through his attorney Patrick English, has sparked controversy and highlighted ongoing issues in the sport's governance structure. The move follows Bivol's victory over Artur Beterbiev, which had unified all major titles at the 175-pound weight class. Despite this unification, internal disputes among sanctioning bodies have complicated plans for a much-anticipated third bout between Bivol and Beterbiev. Meanwhile, David Benavidez has been named the new WBC champion, raising questions about the legitimacy and fairness of such decisions.
On Monday, Dmitry Bivol made headlines not for his prowess in the ring but for stepping down from the WBC light heavyweight crown. According to WBC president Mauricio Sulaiman, Bivol’s decision was conveyed in what Sulaiman described as an impersonal manner. This action stems from a broader context involving conflicts between different sanctioning organizations like the WBC, WBO, WBA, and IBF. These entities often clash over their own interests, complicating efforts to promote unified championship fights. Bivol’s relinquishment comes after he successfully defended his title against longtime rival Artur Beterbiev in February, avenging a previous loss and tying their rivalry at one win apiece.
A source close to Bivol revealed that the decision to step down is tied to dissatisfaction with how sanctioning bodies handle rankings and mandatory challenges. Specifically, they criticized the WBC for favoritism shown toward fighters like Saul "Canelo" Alvarez, who enjoyed flexibility in choosing opponents despite having mandatory challengers waiting. In contrast, Bivol faced rigid rules without similar accommodations. This inconsistency undermines trust in the system and raises concerns about fairness in determining champions.
The upcoming trilogy fight between Bivol and Beterbiev remains unaffected by these developments, though its status as an undisputed championship match is now diminished. Traditionally, sanctioning bodies operate under a rotational policy when multiple titles are unified within a division. Under this framework, the IBF would have been next in line rather than the WBC promoting David Benavidez prematurely. Such procedural missteps further tarnish the reputation of governing bodies already scrutinized for questionable practices.
As the dust settles on this latest controversy, it becomes clear that all parties involved—Bivol, Benavidez, and especially the WBC—are left grappling with negative consequences. For fans eager to see genuine competition decide outcomes, this episode serves as another reminder of how external factors can disrupt even the most compelling rivalries. Moving forward, restoring integrity and transparency will be crucial if boxing hopes to maintain public interest amidst such turbulent times.