Construction
DOT Settles Legal Challenge to DBE Program, Redefining Inclusion Criteria
2025-06-02

A landmark agreement has been reached between the Department of Transportation (DOT) and plaintiffs challenging the constitutionality of its Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program. This settlement effectively alters how women- and minority-owned businesses qualify for automatic inclusion in the initiative. According to legal filings on May 28 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, awaiting judicial approval, the DOT will no longer uphold race or gender as predetermined qualifications for participation in the DBE program.

The decision marks a significant shift from previous administrations' efforts to defend the program's structure after the U.S. Supreme Court banned affirmative action in higher education admissions in 2023. Instead of relying solely on race or gender presumptions, the DOT now intends to evaluate individual circumstances more thoroughly. Similar adjustments were made by the Small Business Administration when it restructured its 8(a) Business Development Program following a successful legal challenge.

Christopher Slottee, an expert in federal contracting at the Alaska-based law firm Schwabe, explained that if the court accepts the consent order, companies previously certified as DBEs based solely on race or gender may need recertification under new standards. These criteria will require demonstrating specific disadvantages encountered during business operations rather than assuming them based on demographic factors alone. Additionally, the case remains open as Democracy Forward, known for opposing former President Donald Trump's policies, recently secured approval to intervene.

Regardless of the final verdict, Christopher Slottee anticipates that managing the DBE program will become significantly more intricate. Under the terms of the settlement, state-level DOTs must reassess all existing DBE contractors without applying assumptions of disadvantage tied exclusively to race or gender. Consequently, even one contractor certified under outdated rules could hinder future awards within their jurisdiction. For instance, should a single company in Alaska retain certification due to past presumptions, the DOT might be unable to approve projects with DBE goals statewide.

This development underscores the importance of fair competition while promoting inclusivity through evidence-based assessments. It highlights the necessity of adapting policies to align with evolving societal norms and legal standards, ensuring equitable opportunities for all participants in federal contracting processes. By focusing on actual experiences and challenges faced by businesses, the revised framework aims to create a balanced environment where merit and genuine need determine success.

more stories
See more