In the weeks following President Trump's second inauguration, Elon Musk’s DOGE initiative has embarked on a series of aggressive actions targeting multiple federal agencies. The approach adopted by DOGE involves rapid changes in leadership, control over IT systems, and closures of agency buildings. Despite facing significant legal challenges, DOGE continues to push forward with its restructuring efforts, drawing both criticism and support from various quarters.

Leadership Changes and Social Media Criticism

The first phase of DOGE's strategy involves installing loyalists in key positions within targeted agencies. This move ensures that individuals aligned with Musk and Trump's vision take charge of critical operations. Additionally, Musk frequently uses social media platforms to criticize these agencies, highlighting perceived inefficiencies and wasteful spending. This dual approach aims to dismantle existing structures while promoting a narrative of reform and efficiency.

For instance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio assumed an acting director role at USAID, while Tom Krause, a Silicon Valley executive, replaced a career official at the Treasury Department. Similarly, Russell Vought became the acting director at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Musk's posts on X have been particularly vocal about USAID and the CFPB, labeling them as examples of government excess. His criticisms often focus on specific programs or initiatives, such as USAID's spending habits and the Treasury Department's payment system. These public statements serve to build momentum for the changes being implemented.

Operational Disruptions and Legal Challenges

DOGE's operational tactics include gaining access to agency computer systems and altering websites, leading to significant disruptions. Employees are often instructed to work remotely or stop working altogether, further destabilizing agency functions. The closure of headquarters and deactivation of online platforms add to the chaos, raising concerns about the security and accessibility of sensitive data.

USAID's website was shut down, and its social media pages deactivated, while the CFPB's website faced similar issues. Employees at these agencies were told to stay home or placed on administrative leave. In some cases, entire buildings were closed, with signage removed and future reopening plans left uncertain. These actions have not gone unchallenged, as numerous lawsuits have been filed against DOGE's interventions. Courts have intervened to limit access to sensitive data and block certain actions, adding another layer of complexity to the restructuring process. Musk's responses on social media, accusing judges of a "judicial coup," reflect the contentious nature of these legal battles.