Since returning to the White House, President Donald Trump has swiftly launched an ambitious initiative to cut federal spending. The newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by billionaire Elon Musk, has already begun targeting several federal agencies. From diversity programs to international aid organizations, DOGE’s actions have sparked controversy and legal challenges. This report provides an overview of the agencies affected and the implications of these changes.

Musk's Rapid Actions Under DOGE

In the span of just a few weeks, DOGE has made significant moves against various government entities. On January 31, it terminated over 100 contracts related to diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) initiatives across 30 agencies, resulting in savings exceeding $1 billion. One of the most notable targets has been the US Agency for International Development (USAID), which channels billions in humanitarian aid worldwide. Musk accused USAID of being a "criminal organization" and drastically reduced its workforce from over 10,000 employees to fewer than 300, though this action was partially blocked by a federal judge.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has also come under scrutiny following a recent plane crash. Musk announced plans to upgrade the agency’s safety systems, drawing both praise and criticism. While some lawmakers express confidence in Musk’s technological expertise, others argue that his involvement poses conflicts of interest due to his role as CEO of SpaceX.

Additionally, Musk has been granted limited access to the Treasury Department’s digital payment system, sparking concerns about data privacy. Meanwhile, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) faces potential closure, with Musk calling for its elimination. The agency has halted most operations, raising fears about the future of consumer financial protections.

Potential Impacts and Concerns

From a journalistic perspective, the rapid changes brought by DOGE raise important questions about governance and accountability. Critics argue that Musk’s involvement in federal affairs could undermine the independence of crucial agencies like NOAA and FEMA, potentially compromising essential services. The legality of these actions is also under scrutiny, with multiple lawsuits challenging DOGE’s authority. Ultimately, this initiative highlights the ongoing debate between fiscal conservatism and the need for robust public institutions. As these developments unfold, it remains to be seen how they will shape the future of American governance.