Vegan and PlantBased
Filmmaker Peter Jackson Funds Bold Moa De-Extinction Project
2025-07-17
Explore the cutting-edge intersection of science, ambition, and ethical considerations as a celebrated filmmaker embarks on an extraordinary journey to revive a long-lost species, prompting a global discussion on humanity's role in the natural world.

Unveiling the Past: A Cinematic Vision to Reawaken Giants

A Visionary's Foray into De-Extinction: The Moa's Return

Peter Jackson, the visionary behind cinematic masterpieces like "The Lord of the Rings," is now turning his attention to an equally epic, albeit real-world, endeavor: the revival of an extinct avian species. Reports indicate that Jackson, alongside his creative partner Fran Walsh, has committed a substantial $15 million to Colossal Biosciences. Their audacious goal is to genetically engineer a creature resembling the majestic South Island giant moa, a towering, flightless bird that once roamed New Zealand before succumbing to overhunting approximately six centuries ago.

Scientific Collaboration and Ethical Dilemmas: The Path to Resurrection

This ambitious undertaking involves a pivotal partnership with the Ngāi Tahu Research Centre, where Māori scholars are integral in shaping the research's direction. Jackson, a passionate collector of moa bones, views this project as a personal pursuit, a "fun thing." Scientists at Colossal Biosciences are set to extract genetic material from preserved moa remains, comparing it with the DNA of modern birds such as emus and tinamous to isolate the distinct characteristics of the moa. Subsequently, they plan to utilize CRISPR technology to modify living avian species, inching closer to their de-extinction aspirations.

Echoes of "Jurassic Park": A Cautionary Tale for De-Extinction

However, this fantastical vision, reminiscent of "Jurassic Park," is not without its serious implications. Ecologist Stuart Pimm raises a critical warning: even if a moa-like animal could be engineered, its reintroduction into the wild might prove impractical, or even perilous. Critics further contend that such de-extinction efforts could inadvertently divert vital attention and funding from ongoing conservation initiatives aimed at protecting currently endangered species, who are in dire need of support.

The Ethical Quandary: Science, Spectacle, or Ecological Imperative?

As the scientific exploration into de-extinction progresses, crucial questions arise: Is this endeavor ethically sound? Does it align with ecological principles? Or is it merely a captivating spectacle, devoid of genuine ecological benefit? The answers remain elusive, prompting a profound introspection into humanity's responsibilities towards the planet's biodiversity.

Prioritizing Present Preservation: A Call for Conservation

Instead of pursuing the resurrection of creatures from the distant past, it is imperative to channel our collective energies towards safeguarding the species that still exist. Supporting legitimate conservation endeavors and biodiversity protection efforts today is paramount. The focus should be on practical, impactful work rather than engaging in what some might term "vanity science" that attempts to manipulate the natural order by playing God with extinct animals.

more stories
See more