Medical Science
Senate Probes GSK's Asthma Inhaler Strategy Amid Pricing Concerns
2025-06-27
The controversy surrounding GSK's decision to withdraw its popular asthma inhaler and introduce a higher-priced generic alternative has drawn significant scrutiny. This article delves into the escalating legislative inquiry into GSK's practices, focusing on the potential implications for patient access and public health funding.

Unveiling Corporate Maneuvers: A Senate Investigation into Pharmaceutical Pricing

Senate Inquiry Initiated into GSK's Inhaler Transition

U.S. Senator Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) has launched an official inquiry into GSK, following the pharmaceutical giant's controversial move to replace a widely used asthma inhaler with an authorized generic product priced significantly higher. The senator's concerns center on the potential impact of this decision on Medicaid rebates and, more critically, on patient well-being.

Legislative Concerns and Patient Impact

In a formal communication addressed to GSK, Senator Hassan articulated her view that the discontinuation of the original inhaler in January 2024 has resulted in dire, potentially life-threatening outcomes for patients and has contributed to a rise in hospital admissions. She has strongly urged GSK to reintroduce the original product to the market and has requested a comprehensive disclosure of documents pertaining to pricing structures, rebate agreements, and all correspondence with regulatory agencies.

Precedent Set by Previous Congressional Scrutiny

This is not the first instance of legislative backlash against GSK concerning this particular product change. Earlier in the year, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) called upon the Office of Inspector General within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to investigate GSK. Senator Warren accused the company of engaging in "outrageous profiteering," highlighting that this strategic maneuver cost Medicaid nearly $1 billion in the previous year alone.

more stories
See more