Retail
U-Haul's Pricing Practices Under Scrutiny: A Closer Look at Deceptive Marketing
2025-05-08

A well-known name in the moving industry, U-Haul finds itself under fire for allegedly misleading advertising practices. The company prominently advertises a $19.95 truck rental fee, but watchdog groups argue that this figure is far from the actual cost consumers face. Instead, they claim it’s part of a bait-and-switch scheme where additional fees significantly inflate the final price. This issue has prompted formal complaints to the Federal Trade Commission and various state attorneys general, accusing U-Haul of deceptive marketing tactics. Such strategies are not uncommon across industries, making it increasingly challenging for consumers to discern true costs upfront.

The controversy surrounding U-Haul stems from its advertised rental rate, which many argue misleads customers. According to Laura Smith, legal director of Truth in Advertising (TINA.org), no consumer actually pays the $19.95 rate due to hidden charges such as mileage, insurance, and environmental fees. These extras often go unnoticed until checkout, partly because the fine print explaining them isn't easily visible on moving vehicles. For instance, a 2016 rental revealed a breakdown including $10.32 for mileage, $11 for insurance, and an extra dollar for an environmental fee, totaling over double the advertised amount.

Moreover, U-Haul incorporates several non-negotiable fees into its pricing structure, like the environmental fee, which pushes costs beyond the initial advertisement. Other charges, such as insurance and mileage, may seem optional but are effectively compulsory, complicating the booking process further. Consumers often encounter preselected add-ons during reservations, requiring active deselection to avoid unnecessary expenses. This approach mirrors broader economic trends where companies use similar tactics to lure customers with low-ball figures only to tack on numerous extras later.

This isn't U-Haul's first brush with regulatory scrutiny; back in 2010, the FTC accused the company of price-fixing collusion with Avis Budget Group. While U-Haul denied any wrongdoing then, recent financial reports indicate that these ancillary fees contribute substantially to its revenue growth. Despite requests for comment, U-Haul remains silent on current allegations. Moving represents one of life's most stressful experiences, compounded by unexpected costs when relying on seemingly affordable alternatives like U-Haul.

Consumer advocates emphasize the importance of transparency in pricing to empower informed decision-making. They suggest practical steps consumers can take to protect themselves against such practices, including thoroughly reading terms and conditions, asking questions before committing, and using credit cards for transactions to facilitate disputes if needed. Although there have been legislative efforts to curb deceptive pricing, such as new FTC rules targeting live events and short-term lodging, widespread adoption across all sectors remains elusive. As for U-Haul, whether regulatory bodies will act remains uncertain, leaving potential renters wary of advertised rates that rarely reflect total expenses.

more stories
See more