Retail
Students Navigate Ethical and Practical Challenges in AI Adoption for Academic Work
2025-03-26

Academic life is evolving as students across the globe incorporate artificial intelligence into their study routines. Conversations with over a dozen students reveal mixed emotions about using AI to manage coursework, ranging from convenience to concern. Despite its potential to lighten workloads, many students express unease about over-relying on technology that could impact their skills and future career prospects.

Among those who use AI, feelings of discomfort or skepticism are common. Ellis Edgeman, an accounting student at Florida State University, avoids AI due to concerns about accuracy and effort. "It seems like more work than just doing the assignment," he explained, highlighting the challenge of verifying and rewording AI-generated content. Similarly, Michael, a computer science major at the University of Miami, fears stagnation in personal and professional growth. He admits guilt over depending on technology that might eventually replace programming jobs but acknowledges widespread reliance among peers. "The longer the semester goes, the easier it is to fall into that trap," he noted.

Some students employ AI strategically to handle repetitive tasks rather than complete assignments. Nicole Rivera-Reyes, a senior legal studies major at the University of Central Florida, uses Google's NotebookLM for transcription and note-taking, emphasizing its role in streamlining busywork rather than replacing human effort. Others turn to AI out of necessity due to overwhelming schedules. A health sciences major and a musical theater student at the University of Miami describe how AI helps them balance heavy course loads and extracurricular commitments, enabling time for self-care and basic needs.

While AI offers efficiency, long-term reliance raises concerns about skill atrophy. Riley, a computer science student at the University of Florida, notices memory gaps after prolonged AI usage. Research supports these worries, indicating reduced critical engagement when users depend too heavily on automation. However, Patrick Wilson, an anthropology student at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, believes responsibility lies with individuals to use AI thoughtfully. John Keon, studying finance at Saint Joseph’s University, views AI as part of technological progress but warns against automating academic creativity, which thrives on brainstorming and boredom. Ultimately, balancing innovation with traditional learning methods fosters growth and prepares students for both academic and professional challenges ahead. Embracing technology while maintaining critical thinking ensures readiness for future opportunities and responsibilities.

More Stories
see more