A recent revelation has sparked outrage as former President Donald Trump reportedly expressed intentions to deport American citizens to El Salvador’s notorious mega-prisons. During discussions with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele, Trump allegedly requested the construction of five additional CECOT-style facilities for housing deported U.S. citizens accused of criminal activities. This alarming proposal raises significant constitutional and humanitarian concerns, particularly in light of past wrongful deportations and detainments.

In a series of high-profile negotiations, Trump is said to have enthusiastically endorsed this drastic measure, claiming he would implement it without hesitation. The plan primarily targets individuals labeled as criminals, though historical precedents indicate that such classifications can extend far beyond legitimate offenders, encompassing political dissenters, students, and even tourists. This initiative echoes troubling patterns observed during previous administrations where civil liberties were compromised under the guise of national security.

The situation took a darker turn following the unjust deportation of Kilmar Abrego García, a legal U.S. resident who was sent to a Salvadoran prison despite a Supreme Court directive prohibiting his extradition. Such incidents underscore the grave risks associated with Trump's proposal, which many experts argue violates both domestic law and international human rights standards.

Despite these legal challenges, sources close to Trump suggest that his administration remains committed to exploring avenues for executing this contentious strategy. Legal scholars and advocacy groups warn that proceeding with such plans could set dangerous precedents for future governance practices within the United States.

Public outcry against this potential policy shift continues to grow, prompting calls for immediate action to safeguard fundamental rights and freedoms. Activists urge citizens to sign petitions aimed at halting what they describe as an unprecedented assault on justice and democracy. As debates intensify, the stakes remain high for all stakeholders involved in ensuring fair treatment under the law.