Finance
Dolphins' Cornerback Conundrum: A Costly Mistake in the Making
2025-04-15

In a surprising turn of events, less than a year after signing cornerback Jalen Ramsey to an expensive contract, the Miami Dolphins are now contemplating trading him. This decision comes with significant financial repercussions tied to his current deal. The Dolphins must carefully weigh their options as they face potential dead-money charges and the challenge of finding a team willing to take on Ramsey's costly contract.

Back in September, the Dolphins inked Ramsey to a lucrative agreement averaging $24.1 million annually, shortly after the Broncos set a new benchmark by signing Patrick Surtain II at $24 million per year. However, the Dolphins' enthusiasm for Ramsey appears to have waned rapidly. With the passage of just eight months, the team is exploring the possibility of moving on from one of its highest-paid players.

The timing of such a trade carries substantial financial implications. If executed before June 1, the transaction would result in a staggering $25.213 million dead-money charge. Postponing the move until after June 1 would distribute this burden over two fiscal years—$6.745 million in 2025 and $18.468 million in 2026. Additionally, Ramsey has already pocketed a $4 million roster bonus, making earlier negotiation more advantageous.

Ramsey's contract includes a fully guaranteed option bonus for 2025 worth $18.98 million, along with a secure base salary of $1.255 million for the same year. These figures amount to a hefty $20.153 million investment in a player who will be 31 years old by then, raising doubts about his long-term value. Consequently, any interested team would need to absorb these costs, complicating negotiations for a trade.

This situation underscores the Dolphins' challenging predicament. They may need to shoulder part of Ramsey's remaining obligations to facilitate a trade, further highlighting the imprudence of their initial decision. Regardless of the outcome, the Dolphins face inevitable financial consequences due to what now appears to be a poorly thought-out contractual commitment.

more stories
See more