The animated film Flow, nominated for two Oscars in 2025, initially seemed like a perfect family movie night choice. However, the experience turned out to be quite different for the children. While the visuals were captivating and the story compelling, it presented challenges that were too intense for younger viewers. The lack of dialogue and the perilous situations the characters faced added layers of complexity that left the kids feeling scared and confused. Despite its acclaim, Flow may not be suitable for all young audiences.

Visually Striking Yet Emotionally Intense

The animation in Flow is undeniably impressive, crafted entirely using Blender, an open-source software. Both adults and children marveled at the detailed portrayal of the central character, a dark grey cat, and its companions. The capybara and other animals brought an additional charm to the narrative. However, the visual appeal was overshadowed by the emotional intensity of the plot, which proved overwhelming for the younger audience members. The rapid shifts between excitement and fear made it difficult for them to fully engage with the story.

Flow’s animation, while visually stunning, carried a depth that went beyond what many children could handle. The use of Blender created a unique aesthetic, setting it apart from other animated films. The dark grey cat, along with its animal allies, was beautifully rendered, capturing attention immediately. Yet, the intricate storyline and the frequent moments of danger left the kids oscillating between fascination and distress. They found themselves struggling to comprehend the complex narrative, often requiring pauses to ask questions or seek reassurance. The blend of beauty and peril made it challenging for younger viewers to stay engaged without feeling overwhelmed.

A Dialogue-Free Experience That Challenges Understanding

One of the most distinctive features of Flow is its complete absence of dialogue. This artistic choice enhanced the film’s atmosphere but posed significant challenges for the children. Without verbal cues, they frequently felt lost, unsure of what was happening. The need to pause and explain various elements disrupted the flow of the movie, making it less enjoyable for them. While this approach added a layer of sophistication, it also made it harder for younger viewers to follow the story.

The lack of dialogue in Flow was both a strength and a hurdle. For adults, it provided a fresh perspective on storytelling, emphasizing visual and musical cues to convey emotions and events. However, for children, it introduced confusion and frustration. Moments that should have been filled with wonder became points of uncertainty, as they struggled to piece together the narrative without spoken words. The parents had to frequently intervene, explaining scenes and reassuring their kids about the safety of the characters. Despite these interruptions, the film’s innovative approach to storytelling is commendable, though it might not be the best fit for younger audiences seeking straightforward narratives.