The eagerly anticipated Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has been making waves with its promising features, but recent benchmark results have sparked some concerns. While the previous leak indicated impressive performance metrics that surpassed the iPhone 16 Pro Max, the latest data shows a more mixed picture. The new benchmarks reveal slightly lower scores in both single-core and multi-core tests compared to earlier leaks. However, it's important to note that these numbers are just one aspect of the phone's overall performance and should be considered alongside other factors like optimization and battery life.
New Benchmark Data Raises Questions About Galaxy S25 Ultra’s Performance
In late December, TECHINFOSOCIALS posted the latest benchmark scores for the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra on X. According to the report, the device scored 3,049 in the single-core test and 9,793 in the multi-core test. These figures represent a slight dip from the previous leaked scores of 3,148 and 10,236, respectively. Interestingly, the Snapdragon 8 Elite processor used in this test was clocked at 4.47GHz for the primary cores, higher than the typical 4.32GHz seen in earlier tests. Despite this overclocking, the performance did not improve as expected.
The comparison table below highlights how the Galaxy S25 Ultra stacks up against its predecessor and Apple's flagship:
| Phones | Single Core | Multicore |
|---|---|---|
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (current) | 3,049 | 9,793 |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (previous) | 3,148 | 10,236 |
| Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | 3,400 | 8,341 |
| Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | 2,300 | 7,249 |
Despite the lower scores, the multi-core performance of the Galaxy S25 Ultra still outpaces the iPhone 16 Pro Max. Moreover, the device is rumored to come with several enhancements, including a sleeker design, a potentially larger 6.9-inch display, an improved 50MP ultrawide camera, and support for Qi2 magnetic charging. It's also worth noting that the Galaxy S25 Ultra appears to feature 12GB of RAM, indicating that the 16GB variant may not be available across all models.
From a journalist's perspective, it's crucial to remember that benchmarks alone do not define a smartphone's value. Factors such as software optimization, user experience, and battery efficiency play significant roles in determining the overall quality of a device. The discrepancy between the current and previous benchmark results could simply be an anomaly or a result of suboptimal overclocking. As we await further updates, it's best to keep an open mind and consider multiple aspects before drawing conclusions about the Galaxy S25 Ultra's true capabilities.