Recent research conducted by Drexel University's Dornsife School of Public Health has shed light on how newly planted urban trees influence birth outcomes. By analyzing a comprehensive dataset from Portland, Oregon, where over 36,000 trees were planted between 1990 and 2020, the study reveals a significant correlation between tree planting and healthier newborns. The findings, published in Science of the Total Environment, highlight that proximity to newly planted trees can lead to increased birth weight and reduced risks of pre-term births.
While established trees contribute to health benefits, newly planted ones also play a crucial role. Each tree planted within 100 meters of a mother’s home was linked to a 2.3-gram increase in birth weight. Additionally, the psychological impact of green spaces, particularly mature trees, may further enhance these benefits. This research underscores the importance of integrating urban greening initiatives into public health strategies.
The study utilized an extensive dataset involving over 36,000 trees planted in Portland over three decades. Researchers examined birth records from 2015 to 2020, focusing on mothers living near these newly planted trees. Controlling for factors like maternal BMI and education, they found that each tree planted within 100 meters of a mother's residence led to a measurable improvement in newborn health metrics.
In more detail, the research highlighted that the presence of at least ten trees within close proximity to a mother’s home resulted in approximately a 50-gram increase in birth weight. This effect seems to plateau after about ten trees. Although this might not appear substantial individually, collectively it could reduce the number of babies classified as small for gestational age, thus lowering developmental risks later in life. These results emphasize the potential of urban greening projects to positively impact early-life health.
Beyond physical health benefits, the study suggests that the psychological restoration offered by established trees may surpass that of newly planted ones. Older trees provide a calming environment described as “soft fascination,” which contrasts with the stress-inducing characteristics of urban landscapes. This aspect could explain why existing trees better mitigate the negative effects of road density on birth outcomes compared to newly planted trees.
Furthermore, the authors acknowledge the challenges of attributing causality due to external variables such as rising temperatures and wildfire smoke affecting birth weights during the study period. Despite these complexities, the data strongly supports the idea that planting trees enhances public health. While randomized controlled trials are necessary for definitive proof, the current evidence aligns closely with previous studies linking green spaces to improved health outcomes. This reinforces the value of incorporating tree planting programs into broader public health policies aimed at fostering healthier communities from infancy onward.