In recent weeks, dealmaking on Wall Street has experienced a significant slowdown due to the uncertainty surrounding President Trump's aggressive trade policies. This marks a shift from earlier expectations that 2025 would see a rebound in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) as well as initial public offerings (IPOs). Industry insiders attribute this downturn to the economic outlook being clouded by the Trump administration's actions, which have left corporate boards and buyout firms hesitant to proceed with major financial decisions. While some bankers report only a minor deceleration in corporate dealmaking, others describe the situation as dire, comparable to the halt in dealmaking during the peak of the Covid-19 pandemic.
As we delve deeper into the impact of these policies, it becomes evident that the uncertainty is affecting various aspects of the financial industry. Seth Goldblum, a managing director at CBIZ Private Equity Services, notes that private equity firms are largely sitting on the sidelines, waiting for clarity regarding the implications of Trump's tariffs on inflation and interest rates. This hesitation stems from concerns about how these factors could influence both the economy and stock market performance.
Rob Stowe, an equity capital markets banker with Barclays, echoes similar sentiments, stating that while companies are still considering coming to market, the added layer of caution is making decision-making more challenging. In contrast, Eric Li from Crisil Coalition Greenwich paints a bleaker picture, suggesting that dealmaking has virtually frozen, reminiscent of the economic conditions witnessed during the global lockdowns of 2020.
Data from EY indicates that January started off strong with a notable increase in M&A activities valued over $1 billion. However, February saw a marked decline coinciding with the stock market's negative reaction to Trump's trade policies, leading to a roughly 10% drop in the S&P 500 since its high point in February.
The repercussions extend beyond dealmaking, impacting hiring and layoffs within investment banks. Brianne Sterling from Selby Jennings reports that although hiring hasn't ceased entirely, it hasn't reached the levels anticipated at the start of the year. Banks like Goldman Sachs are focusing on cost-cutting measures, including reducing redundancies and relocating workers to less expensive locations. Layoffs have also been reported at Bank of America, primarily affecting junior roles such as analysts and associates, though some may be reassigned internally.
Sid Khosla from EY emphasizes that these layoffs are part of broader efficiency conversations among companies aiming to satisfy shareholder demands. The duration of this turmoil remains uncertain, leaving the future of corporate dealmaking unclear. According to Stowe, there is no guarantee that the current volatility will subside anytime soon, further complicating the financial landscape.
Amidst these challenges, the financial sector continues to navigate through uncharted waters, hoping for stabilization that could reignite dealmaking activities and restore confidence in the market. The ongoing dialogue between policymakers and financial executives will play a crucial role in determining the trajectory of Wall Street's recovery and its ability to adapt to evolving economic conditions.