A local school's proposal to extend the operational hours of its tennis courts has sparked significant backlash from nearby residents. The City of Norwich School sought to expand weekday evening access and introduce Sunday openings for the courts, but objections over noise and light disturbances led to the rejection of their application by the city council’s planning committee. Concerned neighbors argue that these disruptions severely impact their quality of life, while the school emphasizes the importance of enhancing community recreational opportunities.

The controversy centers on Eaton Road, where the City of Norwich School planned to adjust its tennis court schedules. Originally intending to extend weekday evenings until 20:30 BST instead of 19:00 BST, as well as offering additional Saturday hours and opening Sundays, the initiative faced stiff opposition. Residents such as Raymond Clark highlighted how every sound from the court—be it ball bounces or player chatter—penetrates their homes. Furthermore, issues with floodlights intruding upon neighboring gardens and dwellings added fuel to the fire.

Complicating matters further, recent adjustments were made when the school had to lower the height of its lights due to violations of existing planning conditions. This history, coupled with communication barriers between the institution and affected individuals, contributed to a loss of trust among locals. Labour councillor Carli Harper criticized the school's handling of the situation, accusing them of showing "contempt" towards the community. She expressed concerns about unresolved longstanding problems related to site management.

In response, the school maintains that the courts are vital components within their broader outdoor facilities offerings. They cited increased demand alongside partnerships with national sports organizations necessitating expanded public accessibility. Two consultation sessions were organized with residents to address proposed modifications and gather input. Additionally, measures like commissioning a noise evaluation and proposing an acoustic barrier have been undertaken. Despite the setback regarding initial plans, the school remains dedicated to collaborating with stakeholders for future improvements.

While the extension plans remain shelved for now, the dialogue continues between the school and its community members. Balancing recreational needs against residential tranquility presents ongoing challenges. Both parties must work together constructively if any resolution is to be achieved moving forward.