A significant overhaul is urgently needed within the Administration for Children’s Services (ACS) as mounting evidence suggests a disturbing trend of neglect. Over the past year, at least seven minority children have tragically lost their lives under circumstances that raise serious questions about ACS's effectiveness and impartiality. The organization appears increasingly reluctant to intervene in cases where children face severe risks from abusive or neglectful guardians, often citing progressive ideals as justification. However, such an approach has led to catastrophic outcomes, including the heartbreaking case of Promise Cotton, who was discovered alone with her deceased family members after ACS failed to act despite clear warning signs.

The failure to protect vulnerable children extends beyond isolated incidents, revealing systemic issues within the agency. Instances like Jahmeik Modlin, who perished due to alleged starvation despite prior visits by ACS workers, highlight a concerning pattern of inadequate judgment when assessing risk levels. Similarly, Jalayah Eason’s tragic death underscores how critical information, such as a caregiver’s untreated mental health condition, can be overlooked. According to whistleblowers, there exists immense pressure on employees to avoid separating families unless absolutely necessary, leading them to recommend counseling instead of more decisive actions. This misguided prioritization frequently results in overruling recommendations made by conscientious fieldworkers who advocate for child removals.

New York City deserves leadership that places child welfare above ideological agendas. It is imperative for Mayor Eric Adams to recognize the flaws within ACS and take decisive steps towards reforming its policies. By replacing Commissioner Jess Dannhauser and restructuring the organizational culture, the agency could better fulfill its mission of safeguarding children. Upholding social justice means ensuring every child receives equal protection regardless of race or socioeconomic background. Removing children from perilous environments should never be framed as discriminatory; rather, it reflects a commitment to fairness and equality. Let us strive for a future where all children are given the opportunity to thrive safely.